The
Pandemic as a Catalyst for Digital Transformation
By Khaniri Newton
The COVID-19 pandemic played a key role in accelerating the global shift from traditional classroom settings to digital learning platforms. The pandemic led to an exposure of the existing weaknesses in traditional education and created room for growth in terms of modern innovations in education delivery. COVID-19 was the catalyst and prior to it, the world relied on face to face institutions. E-learning platforms were available, but this was only in rare cases of higher education and perhaps corporate training.
The sudden onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 led to widespread school closures. At the peak of the crisis UNESCO data showed that over 1.6 billion learners in more than 190 countries were out of school (UNESCO, 2020). This gave rise to a need for emergency transitions to remote learning and in response to the global lockdowns, institutions shifted rapidly to online learning platforms such as Zoom, Google Classroom, and Microsoft Teams (Bozkurt & Sharma, 2020).This shift marked the
first endeavor for multiple schools into online learning and also increased the
creation of online educational content. The pandemic therefore pushed
institutions to digitize their operations and rethink their educational
delivery structures. Critics argued that the shift to digital education during
COVID-19 was not a true catalyst but rather a forced and temporary reaction to
the unprecedented crisis. They contend that the digital shift lacked
sustainability and long term impact. While it is true that some institutions
resumed pre-pandemic methods, the remote learning left a lasting global imprint
that revealed the possibilities of digital learning. Furthermore, it prompted
investments and policy reforms that continue to shape educational systems
today. In this way, COVID-19 wasn’t just a temporary challenge to education,
but an eye opener and catalyst to the long overdue transformation of the global
educational systems.
Pandemic-
driven innovations in Education Delivery
The pandemic led to the innovation of various learning structures such as: adoption of e-books, introduction of virtual classrooms, usage of chat-bots and hybrid learning methods. These innovations that had never been considered previously, had now become necessities and the new order of the day. Many institutions, previously depended on library textbooks for reading material and face to face teaching for educational delivery.
As the pandemic swept, it prompted institutions to teach and learn remotely, which necessitated the appropriate tools. Schools began transitioning from printed textbooks to e-books and integrated chatbots to support learning queries (OECD, 2021). In addition to these, the examination format evolved from invigilated, handwritten tests in exam halls to remote assessments conducted via video call, with students submitting their answers as digital documents. These pandemic-driven innovations not only ensured continuity but also introduced tools that offered practical & scalable solutions to learning while also enhancing student engagement.Skeptics have noted that
the implementation of these innovations was not possible to a significant number
of institutions and students. They further argue that this potentially widened
the equity gap in access to quality education. This is true, disparities were
more evident- however the uprise of these innovations led to worldwide efforts
toward inclusion. Development organizations and governments embarked on
prioritizing: digital infrastructure, distributing devices and teacher training
programs. This was in order to lay a foundation for more equitable access to
the modern tools- that had become a necessity now- moving forward. In the
long-run, the innovation wave unlocked new learning and career pathways for students,
while also building a secure education system that can adapt accordingly in the
face of future crises or sudden shifts in the educational landscape.
Changing
roles
The pandemic-induced
shift called for a redefinition of educational roles both for educators and
students. In traditional classrooms, teachers relied on physical tools such as:
chalkboards, printed material and face to face interactions. With the
introduction of remote learning, digital skills became a must have, and both
teachers and students had to adapt quickly.
The pandemic elevated the
role of educators to include: increased autonomy, creativity and leadership in
education. In an unprecedented change with little time, the teachers were
forced to create their own digital curriculums, experiment with foreign tools
and innovate engagement strategies that would be effective in virtual cases.
This shift from their normal routine and activities, was foreign and introduced
many new roles they had to play in order to ensure continuity of education
during the pandemic and even past it.
For the students, the
pandemic-induced shift redefined their role from passive recipients to active
participants in the learning process. Previously, learning was significantly
reliant on adherence to the teachers’ guidance, instruction and structure. With
the shift to digital learning, students were compelled to: navigate digital
platforms, manage engagement, manage time schedules, and adapt to the
educator’s curriculum/mode of education delivery.
Digital
divide and inequality in education
This exclusion had
negative effects on various groups in the education system with- long-term
learning loss, increased dropout rates and emotional distress- being at the
forefront. Students with disabilities who required special attention, faced
additional layers of exclusion and were presented with content that wasn’t
adaptable to their needs. There were also cases of girls in rural areas who
were unable to return to school post lockdown due to early pregnancies.
Long term transformation in education.
What began as an emergency response has become a permanent transformation in education delivery methods. Initially, remote learning was perceived as a temporary fix. However, sustained improvements, institutional investments, and positive feedback from flexible learning models have entrenched e-learning into long-term education plans. Post-pandemic, many institutions have adopted blended learning permanently.
Global EdTech investments reached over $16 billion in 2021, signaling a long-term shift (HolonIQ, 2021). Policies have evolved to support digital learning even in public education sectors.
Skeptics have however
argued that an overreliance on digital learning has degraded educational
quality. They further highlight issues such as lack of
engagement, poor internet connectivity, and minimal preparedness by both
teachers and students hinder effective and efficient education. There are also
concerns that the digital divide disproportionately affected students in
low-income and rural settings. Due to this reasons skeptics advocate for
traditional education to reign over the ‘unpolished’ remote learning.
While these challenges
are true, they underscore the urgency for digital reform rather than
discrediting the shift. Many of the initial hurdles—like lack of access and low
teacher-student preparedness—are being addressed through investment in
infrastructure, teacher training, and hybrid learning models that have
familiarized students with the online structure. Rather than viewing e-learning
as a lesser substitute, it should be seen as an evolving solution with room for
improvement.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic
brought major changes to education across the world. While it caused
disruption, it also pushed schools and institutions to move quickly from
traditional classroom learning to digital platforms. This shift exposed
problems in the old system, but also opened doors to new ways of teaching and
learning. Teachers took on new roles, students had to become more responsible
for their own learning, and new tools became a part of everyday education. The
pandemic also made clear how big the gap is between those who can access
digital learning and those who can’t. Many students and schools were left
behind because of poor internet and lack of devices. But this challenge sparked
new efforts and tools to make education more equal and accessible. Even though
some believe we should return to the old ways of learning, the pandemic showed
that education can be more flexible, creative, and ready for future challenges.
Instead of seeing digital learning as a temporary fix, we should build on the
progress made and combine traditional and modern methods COVID-19 was not
merely a disruption; it was a catalyst that redefined the possibilities of
education.
References
- Bozkurt,
A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of
global crisis due to Coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance
Education, 15(1), i–vi. https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/447/256
- HolonIQ.
(2021). Global EdTech venture capital report – full year 2021.
https://www.holoniq.com/notes/global-edtech-venture-capital-report-full-year-2021
- Kenya
National Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Economic Survey 2021.
https://www.knbs.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Economic-Survey-2021.pdf
- OECD.
(2021). The state of school education: One year into the COVID pandemic.
OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/state-of-school-education-one-year-into-COVID.htm
- UNESCO.
(2021, March 23). One year into COVID: Where do we stand with education
disruption? https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/one-year-covid-19-education-disruption-where-do-we-stand
- UNICEF.
(2020, August 26). COVID-19: At least a third of the world’s
schoolchildren unable to access remote learning during school closures,
new report says. https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/covid-19-least-third-worlds-schoolchildren-unable-access-remote-learning-during
Great article and delivery of the topic creating a clear understanding of the claim with several evidences, arguments and counterarguments being outlined. Would be interested to get more insights on where the digital transformation had the greatest impact on i.e. early learners, formative levels, tertiary institutions? Developed or developing countries?
ReplyDelete